Here's a couple of shots of a shower by Tetard, Hadiquez and Grisoni (better known as THG) at last month's Maison et Objet éditeurs in Paris. Maison et Objet is a world renowned annual showcase of fantastical house products. Christian May, of the internet's Maison21, is a Maison et Objet habitué and maybe he'll share with us some insights on his various trips over there if we ask him nicely. Anyhow, back to the shower. Here it is.
I thinks it's glorious and it reminds me of a concept pioneered by Dornbracht, another fixture manufacturer. Dornbracht developed something they call a Free Shower. It's free in the sense that it's not walled off. Here are a couple of Dornbracht's Free Showers.
I love them and I love the idea of showering without standing in a box. But then again I have an exhibitionist streak and the years have been kind to me.
What do you think of the idea of showering without boundaries? Did Dornbracht start something great or impractical? Given the opportunity to install the THG shower shown at the top of this post, would you?
23 February 2010
22 February 2010
What is art? Part two
Posted by
Paul Anater
So last night I posed a rhetorical question: what is art?
I was thinking about that question because one of my readers and Twitter pals Christine sent me a link to something that made her roll her eyes. She and I tend to roll our eyes at the same things, so she wanted to share this particular eye roll. Before I get too far ahead of myself, Christine Tweets as @pillowthrowdeco. She's also the pillow maker to the stars and you can see her wares at her Etsy store. If you're north of the 49th parallel, she has a store on iCraft.
Anyhow, she sent me a link to a post written by Casa Sugar a couple of years ago. Now Casa Sugar's a great website and she deserves a lot of credit for spurring the conversation she did in her comments when she ran a poll asking what people thought of this lamp by Philippe Starck.
That was one of four Gun Lamps Philippe Starck designed for Flos a couple of years ago. The comments on Casa Sugar were pretty uniformly horrified by the lamp. And based on their comments, they were missing the point Starck was making with that series. A lot of people thought the lamp was glorifying gun violence. They were also laboring under the mistaken idea that this was some readily-available thing.
I suppose it helps to know who Philippe Starck is.
Philippe Starck is the 61-year-old enfant terrible of the design world. If René Magritte and Salvador Dalí ever got together and made housewares, the result would be something akin to what comes out of the mind of Philippe Starck.
Philippe Starck is an artist in every sense of the word. I define art as a motive as much as an execution. And in my mind, art is the act of an artist observing and interpreting the world he sees. As he interprets the world, he invites me to see the world as he sees it and at the same time, he challenges me to see it for myself. Ponderous definition I know, but it's taken me years to come up with that and that's as streamlined as I can get it.
Anyhow, Starck turns his artist's eye on the world around him and the result is a tumult of shocking, offensive and as often as not, pretty objects.
Here's a handful of them.
He's also an interior designer and an architect. This is a hotel lobby in Argentina.
Amazing. Now back to the gun lamps that offended so many people on Casa Sugar.
Here's the lamp again.
It's plated in 18 karat gold and on the base, it reads Happiness is a Hot Gun.
The shade is black and there are gold crosses on the inside of the shade.
I smell symbolism at work.
Sure enough, in Starck's own words:
These Gun Lamps are intended to be art pieces, clearly. And they're priced as such. Despite the misinterpretations, I can't help but think Monsieur Starck got the reaction he was after precisely.
I think they're hilarious. Brilliant even. I can't see me buying them for me, but I'm sort of glad they're out there.
So. Do these lamps work as art? As illumination? As decor? Or do they fail on all counts?
I was thinking about that question because one of my readers and Twitter pals Christine sent me a link to something that made her roll her eyes. She and I tend to roll our eyes at the same things, so she wanted to share this particular eye roll. Before I get too far ahead of myself, Christine Tweets as @pillowthrowdeco. She's also the pillow maker to the stars and you can see her wares at her Etsy store. If you're north of the 49th parallel, she has a store on iCraft.
Anyhow, she sent me a link to a post written by Casa Sugar a couple of years ago. Now Casa Sugar's a great website and she deserves a lot of credit for spurring the conversation she did in her comments when she ran a poll asking what people thought of this lamp by Philippe Starck.
That was one of four Gun Lamps Philippe Starck designed for Flos a couple of years ago. The comments on Casa Sugar were pretty uniformly horrified by the lamp. And based on their comments, they were missing the point Starck was making with that series. A lot of people thought the lamp was glorifying gun violence. They were also laboring under the mistaken idea that this was some readily-available thing.
I suppose it helps to know who Philippe Starck is.
Philippe Starck is the 61-year-old enfant terrible of the design world. If René Magritte and Salvador Dalí ever got together and made housewares, the result would be something akin to what comes out of the mind of Philippe Starck.
Philippe Starck is an artist in every sense of the word. I define art as a motive as much as an execution. And in my mind, art is the act of an artist observing and interpreting the world he sees. As he interprets the world, he invites me to see the world as he sees it and at the same time, he challenges me to see it for myself. Ponderous definition I know, but it's taken me years to come up with that and that's as streamlined as I can get it.
Anyhow, Starck turns his artist's eye on the world around him and the result is a tumult of shocking, offensive and as often as not, pretty objects.
Here's a handful of them.
He's also an interior designer and an architect. This is a hotel lobby in Argentina.
Amazing. Now back to the gun lamps that offended so many people on Casa Sugar.
Here's the lamp again.
It's plated in 18 karat gold and on the base, it reads Happiness is a Hot Gun.
The shade is black and there are gold crosses on the inside of the shade.
I smell symbolism at work.
Sure enough, in Starck's own words:
Black as colour of deathHmmm, that doesn't sound like the glorification of gun violence to me.
Crosses of our dead ones
Gold colour as ambition
War weapons; domestic weapons, bedside, table, living room weapons.
Aux Armes everywhere, as an ending...
Happiness is a hot gun...
My intent was to create objects to remind us that our state of well-being is the result of somebody else dying.
Philippe Starck
These Gun Lamps are intended to be art pieces, clearly. And they're priced as such. Despite the misinterpretations, I can't help but think Monsieur Starck got the reaction he was after precisely.
I think they're hilarious. Brilliant even. I can't see me buying them for me, but I'm sort of glad they're out there.
So. Do these lamps work as art? As illumination? As decor? Or do they fail on all counts?
21 February 2010
What is art?
Posted by
Paul Anater
Tomorrow, I want to have a discussion about something and in preparation I'm going to pose a question to think about. What is art? Or more accurately, when is art art and when is it something else.
I don't think this painting by Thomas Kincade is art.
But I do think that this spoof of a Kincade painting by Jim Blanchard is.
So what is art? And when does it become art? When does art stop being a craft and what's the difference?
The question is not whether or not you like something. It's easy to dismiss work I don't like as something other than art. My dislike of the work of Thomas Kincade is not what's underneath my dismissal of his stuff.
I don't think this painting by Thomas Kincade is art.
But I do think that this spoof of a Kincade painting by Jim Blanchard is.
So what is art? And when does it become art? When does art stop being a craft and what's the difference?
Piss Christ,
Andres Serrano, 1986
The question is not whether or not you like something. It's easy to dismiss work I don't like as something other than art. My dislike of the work of Thomas Kincade is not what's underneath my dismissal of his stuff.
Red, Orange, Tan and Purple
Mark Rothko, 1949
Guernica
Pablo Picasso, 1937
Starry Night
Vincent van Gogh, 1889
The Luncheon of the Boating Party
Pierre-Auguste Renoir, 1881
Morning Looking East Over the Hudson Valley from the Catskill Mountains
Frederic E. Church, 1848
Quince, Cabbage, Melon and Cucumber
Juan Sánchez Cotán, 1602
Ignudo from the Sistine Chapel
Michelangelo Buonaroti, 1512
Illustration from Li Livres dou Santé by Aldobrandino of Siena
Artist unknown, late 13th century
The Barberini Faun
Ancient Greek artist unknown, 300, BCE
So what's art?
Labels:
art
The terrible ague
Posted by
Paul Anater
Well it took until February, but I've been felled by the Martian death plague that's been sweeping the land. I haven't been sick in ages and I forgot how rotten this feels. The physical part's bad enough, but this thing has sucked out of me every positive thought in head. All is woe.
But now will canker-sorrow eat my bud
And chase the native beauty from his cheek
And he will look as hollow as a ghost,
As dim and meagre as an ague's fit.
Act 3, Scene 4
The Life and Death of King John, William Shakespeare
20 February 2010
Buy this issue!
Posted by
Paul Anater
My copy of 2010's Mosaic Art Now arrived this morning and I am blown away by it. Nancie Mills-Pipgras, Bill Buckingham and Michael Welch pulled out all the stops and took what was once an arts publication and turned it into a coffee table book. Congratulations on a job well done guys.
I wrote an article for this issue and it's a real thrill to see my name in a print publication again. My article is a profile of Yakov and Yulia Hanansen, who are father and daughter as well as being prominent mosaicists. It was a real thrill to meet them and to hear them talk about their art. They are interesting, passionate, talented people and I hope I did them some justice in my profile.
Master Mosaicist Yakov Hanansen looks out at the world from his studio on the 14th floor of an industrial building in Midtown Manhattan. As he works on his latest commission, Yakov is surrounded by 20 years of his own mosaics and they are made brilliant by the morning light streaming through the enormous windows. His work tells the story of an artist committed to defying tradition as he brings both beauty and thought to the world.And that's all you get. If you'd like to read the rest of that article or any of the other 100 plus pages of this magazine you're going to have to buy a copy. Sorry, but arts organizations need every dime they can get, this year more than any.
So buy a copy of 2010's Mosaic Art Now, and then check out the websites of Yulia and Yakov Hanansen.
Labels:
mosaic
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)































